×
Reviews 4.9/5 Order Now

Using STATA to Analyze Wage Determinants and Salary Disparities at SAFECORP

October 26, 2023
Paxton Smith
Paxton Smith
🇨🇦 Canada
STATA
Paxton Smith is the Best STATA Assignment Helper with 7 years of experience and has completed over 1900 assignments. He is from Canada and holds a Master’s in Statistics from the University of Guelph. Paxton excels in guiding students through complex STATA assignments, ensuring high-quality work and a thorough understanding of statistical concepts.
STATA
Tip of the day
Always define your hypotheses and understand the context of the data before starting. Use statistical software like SPSS, R, or Python for accuracy and efficiency. Double-check formulas and ensure your results align with your analysis. Clear labeling of graphs and tables adds value to your presentation.
News
In 2024, Minitab enhanced its web app's tabular output for improved readability, aiding students in data analysis.
Key Topics
  • Problem Description:
  • Solution
  • Data and Methodology
    • Findings
  • Conclusion
  • Appendix I

In our in-depth STATA analysis of wage determinants and salary disparities at SAFECORP, we delve into the intricate factors that influence employees' earnings and shed light on existing disparities between minority and majority groups. This examination not only uncovers critical insights but also highlights the need for equitable compensation practices in the workplace.

Problem Description:

Discrimination in salaries is a growing concern in many companies, where certain individuals are paid less due to factors unrelated to their job performance, such as race, gender, and education. In this STATA assignment, we investigate whether wage discrimination exists at SAFECORP. Specifically, we aim to identify if there is a salary gap between minority and majority employees and determine the key factors influencing wages.

Solution

Introduction

Wage discrimination in the workplace, which involves paying certain individuals less based on non-job-related attributes, is a major concern in various companies. It limits the development of employees' talents and skills, hampers motivation, and creates an uneven career landscape. In this memo, we examine the possibility of salary discrimination at SAFECORP. Our analysis investigates whether a wage gap exists between minority and majority employees, explores which employee characteristics affect salaries, and assesses whether these differences can explain variations in wages.

Data and Methodology

We conducted our analysis using a random sample of 474 employee records. We focused on employees' annual salaries as the primary outcome. The following individual characteristics were considered as explanatory factors: work experience, current position at SAFECORP, highest grade of formal education completed, gender, and minority status. Our analysis employed various statistical tests, including t-tests for salary comparisons, Pearson's Chi-square test for differences in characteristics, and regression analysis to explain salary disparities among minority employees.

Findings

  1. Salary Disparities
    • The average annual salary for majority employees is approximately $72,046.6, while minority employees earn an average of $57,427.9. The absolute difference in annual average wages across the two groups is $14,618.7, which is statistically significant.
  2. Correlation Analysis
    • Correlations reveal that current position and education level are positively associated with salaries. Managers tend to earn more than clerical and custodial workers. Employees with higher education levels also earn more.
    • Work experience has a negligible association with remuneration, and gender is negatively associated with salaries. Male workers receive higher pay than female workers on average.
  3. Comparison of Characteristics
    • Gender imbalance: The minority group consists of 61.5% males and 38.5% females, while the majority group is more evenly distributed, with 52.4% males and 47.6% females.
    • Education: The minority and majority groups have similar education levels, with minor differences that are not statistically significant.
    • Position: A significant difference exists in employee positions at SAFECORP. Only 3.8% of minorities hold managerial positions, compared to 21.6% in the majority group.
  4. Factors Explaining Wage Disparities
    • Holding a managerial position at SAFECORP is associated with a $53,717.0 higher salary compared to being a clerical worker.
    • Gender-based discrimination: Being a female worker is associated with $10,965.6 less salary than being a male worker. Gender discrimination somewhat mitigates the wage gap but is insufficient to ensure salary equality at SAFECORP.

Conclusion

In conclusion, our analysis indicates a significant wage gap between minority and majority employees at SAFECORP. Employee characteristics such as current position, education level, and gender play crucial roles in determining average salaries. Years of experience have minimal impact on remuneration. Differences in position and gender between the majority and minority groups significantly contribute to wage disparities. Position discrimination exacerbates the wage gap, while gender-based discrimination slightly mitigates it.

Appendix I

Figure 1: Average Annual Salaries of Majorities and Minorities ($)

Source: SAFECORP and authors’ calculations P-value < 0.01 for t-test of the difference in average annual salaries for majorities and minorities.

Table 1. Correlation of Average Annual Salaries and Characteristics of Employees

Annual SalaryWork ExperiencePositionGenderEducation Level
Annual Salary1.00-0.080.78-0.450.67
Work Experience-0.081.00-0.010.07-0.05
Position0.78-0.011.00-0.380.51
Gender-0.450.07-0.381.00-0.36
Education Level0.67-0.050.51-0.361.00

Table 2. Basic Characteristics of Majority and Minority Employees

CharacteristicMajority Employees (%) (n = 370)Minority Employees (%) (n = 104)
Gender
Male52.461.5 ***
Female47.638.5
Education Level
810.513.5
1237.649.0
141.41.0
1524.325.0
1614.16.7
172.22.9
182.21.0
197.01.0
200.50.0
210.30.0
Position
Clerical74.683.7 *
Custodial3.812.5
Manager21.63.8

Source: SAFECORP and authors’ calculations p < 0.01, ** p < 0.05, *** p < 0.10 for a chi-square test of the association of this characteristic with majorities versus minorities comparison

Similar Samples

Explore our sample solutions to see how we approach and solve a variety of statistics problems using tools like STATA. These examples demonstrate our methods for delivering accurate and well-structured results. Each sample reflects the quality of work you can expect when choosing our homework services.

Our Popular Services